A prompt posted to /api/sessions/:id/input without `useMux` was written
into the pane in one piece. Claude Code (measured on 2.1.283) takes a
`<text>\r` burst of about a hundred characters or more as a paste, so the
trailing `\r` landed as a newline in the composer and the prompt sat there
unsent while the route answered 200. A later raw `\r` did not recover it;
a tmux `send-keys Enter` did. Short prompts submitted, which is why it
looked random. The same stranding was seen with Codex and OpenCode.
A plain prompt (printable text plus exactly one trailing `\r`, detected by
`isPlainPromptInput()`) now goes through `writeViaMux` even without
`useMux`: the text is typed, Enter is pressed as its own key, and the
SubmitVerifier re-presses it while the prompt is still on the composer.
The write is awaited, since the browser's POST fallback sends frames one
at a time and a following keystroke must not overtake the Enter. Raw
frames (escape sequences, bracketed paste, a line feed, a bare `\r`) and
an explicit `useMux: false` keep the direct write.
Verified on an isolated instance: the 239- and 104-character prompts that
stranded (at +1 s, at +50 s on ultracode, and on a warm session) all
submitted on the first Enter with no `useMux`. The phone's local-echo
flow (a burst, then its `\r` as a separate write) was measured unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both input paths recorded the (clientId, seq) pair as applied and acknowledged the
frame BEFORE knowing whether the write had landed: the POST route because its mux
write is fire-and-forget so the response never waits on a tmux child, the
WebSocket handler because it ACKed unconditionally.
When the write then failed, the client dropped the frame from its durable queue
and the server rejected the retry as a duplicate. The reliable-delivery layer was
guaranteeing exactly-once delivery of something that had never been delivered —
and `Session.write()` returned void, so a session whose PTY was gone swallowed the
data with no signal at all.
- `forgetInputSeq()` rolls the bookkeeping back on failure, but only when that seq
is still the newest one; a later input has superseded it and must not re-open.
- The WebSocket handler withholds its ACK when the write did not land, so the
client redelivers.
- `Session.write()` reports whether it reached a PTY.
Response codes are unchanged, deliberately: a session can legitimately have no PTY
yet, and turning that into a failure status would be a contract change of its own.
What this does NOT do: remove the root cause. The POST still answers 200 before
the mux write is attempted, so a client that treats any 2xx as final cannot learn
about that failure. What closes is the narrower window — the write failed AND the
ACK never reached the client — plus the whole WebSocket path. Closing the rest
would mean awaiting the tmux child inside the request.
9 tests. They drive the HTTP route, not only the Session primitives: with the
rollback removed from the route, 2 of them fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codeman maintainer