[refactor] moving cubes into own package"
Publish snapshot / snapshot (push) Successful in 1m2s

[fix] default parameter run records parameters in session for replay[fix] remove default parameters for several cubes
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Diedrichsen
2026-07-28 12:18:10 +02:00
parent ac050c4459
commit 6ecb2c366f
130 changed files with 3386 additions and 520 deletions
+138 -23
View File
@@ -21,19 +21,44 @@ shipped. If you only want to cut a release, jump to
## What ships
| Directory | Package | Binary |
| ----------------- | ------------------ | -------- |
| `packages/nopy` | `@bitsquare/nopy` | `nopy` |
| `packages/keyman` | `@bitsquare/keyman` | `keyman` |
| Directory | Package | Binary | Kind |
| --------------------- | ----------------------- | -------- | ------------------------ |
| `packages/nopy` | `@bitsquare/nopy` | `nopy` | CLI |
| `packages/keyman` | `@bitsquare/keyman` | `keyman` | CLI |
| `packages/nopy-cube` | `@bitsquare/nopy-cube` | — | library (cube authoring) |
| `packages/cubes-core` | `@bitsquare/cubes-core` | — | cube bundle (no build) |
Both are ESM, both declare `engines.node >= 22`, and both expose a single
All are ESM and declare `engines.node >= 22`. The two CLIs expose a single
executable through `bin`, so `npm install -g` puts `nopy` / `keyman` on the
`PATH`. `cubes/` is not a package and is never published.
`PATH`; the other two are libraries you add to a project.
The tarball contents are pinned by `files: ["dist", "README.md", "LICENSE"]`
sources and tests are not shipped. `publishConfig.access: "public"` is what makes
a scoped package publishable to npmjs without an extra flag; the workflows pass
`--access public` anyway.
The tarball contents are pinned by `files` — for the three TypeScript packages
that is `["dist", "README.md", "LICENSE"]`, so sources and tests are not shipped.
`cubes-core` ships `["cubes", "!cubes/**/*.log", "README.md", "LICENSE"]`: the
negation matters, because a cube that has been run leaves a `pyinfra-debug.log`
next to its `deploy.py`, and `.gitignore` does not filter an npm tarball.
`publishConfig.access: "public"` is what makes a scoped package publishable to
npmjs without an extra flag; the workflows pass `--access public` anyway.
### Dependencies between them
`keyman` stands alone. `nopy` and `cubes-core` both depend on `nopy-cube` through
`workspace:*`, which drives three rules the rest of this document keeps coming
back to:
1. **Publish with `pnpm`, not `npm`.** `link-workspace-packages` is unset and
pnpm 10+ defaults it to `false`, so `workspace:*` is mandatory in the
manifests. npm has no idea what that protocol is: `npm pack` copies the string
through verbatim and the install fails with `EUNSUPPORTEDPROTOCOL`. `pnpm
pack` and `pnpm publish` substitute the concrete version at pack time. Both
workflows use `pnpm publish --ignore-scripts --no-git-checks`.
2. **`nopy-cube` publishes before anything that depends on it.**
`node scripts/publish-order.mjs` prints the publishable directories in
dependency order — note that plain alphabetical `packages/*/` gets this
backwards, putting `nopy` first.
3. **Every packed manifest is checked.** `node scripts/verify-pack.mjs` packs
each non-private package and fails if any `workspace:` range survived into the
tarball. It runs in both publish workflows, after the build.
Versions and changelogs are maintained **by hand**. Nothing in CI commits a
version bump, opens a release PR, or pushes a tag. A release happens because you
@@ -47,7 +72,7 @@ All three live in [`.gitea/workflows`](.gitea/workflows) and run on the
| Workflow | Trigger | Publishes |
| ---------------------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| `ci.yml` | pull requests, non-`main` pushes | nothing |
| `publish-snapshot.yml` | pushes to `main` | **both** packages → Gitea, tag `main` |
| `publish-snapshot.yml` | pushes to `main` | **every** package → Gitea, tag `main` |
| `release.yml` | tags matching `*-v*` | **one** package → Gitea **and** npmjs |
`ci.yml` explicitly excludes `main` and all tags (`branches-ignore` +
@@ -64,13 +89,17 @@ half-finished publish is worse than a slow queue.
```
checkout → pnpm → node → pnpm store cache → install
→ lint:ci → typecheck → test:coverage → coverage summary
→ build → npm pack --dry-run (per package) → upload coverage
→ build → npm pack --dry-run (per package) → verify-pack
→ upload coverage
```
The `npm pack --dry-run --ignore-scripts` step prints the exact file list that
would be published. It is there to catch a `files` or `bin` entry pointing at
something the build no longer produces — a failure that would otherwise only
surface after the version is already on a registry and immutable.
surface after the version is already on a registry and immutable. `verify-pack`
then packs for real and checks no `workspace:` range survived; both publish
workflows run it too, but running it here is what puts the failure on the pull
request rather than on the release.
Coverage HTML/JSON reports are uploaded as a `coverage` artifact with a 7-day
retention. Both the artifact upload and the store cache are
@@ -82,18 +111,25 @@ slower CI rather than broken CI.
```
checkout → pnpm → node → cache → install
→ lint:ci → typecheck → test:coverage → coverage summary → build
→ write .npmrc → publish both packages → delete .npmrc
verify-pack → write .npmrc → publish every package → delete .npmrc
```
One job, no `needs:` barrier, so install and build happen exactly once and
nothing has to be passed between jobs as an artifact.
The publish step is **two passes** over `node scripts/publish-order.mjs`: the
first stamps the snapshot version into every manifest with `npm pkg set`, the
second publishes. They cannot be one loop — `pnpm publish` reads a linked
package's version out of its manifest at pack time, so stamping and publishing
one package at a time would bake the *old* `nopy-cube` version into `nopy`'s
tarball.
### `release.yml`
```
checkout → resolve tag → check secrets
→ pnpm → node → cache → install
→ lint:ci → typecheck → test:coverage → build
→ pnpm → node → cache → install → check linked deps are released
→ lint:ci → typecheck → test:coverage → build → verify-pack
→ publish to Gitea → publish to npmjs → delete .npmrc
→ create the Gitea release → step summary
```
@@ -102,6 +138,14 @@ Tag resolution and the secret check run **before** anything is installed or
built, so a malformed tag or a missing token fails in seconds instead of after
the whole gate.
*Check linked deps are released* asks npmjs whether every `workspace:` dependency
of the package being released already exists at the version pnpm is about to
bake in (`scripts/linked-deps.mjs``npm view`). Tagging `nopy-v1.3.0` while
`@bitsquare/nopy-cube@1.1.0` is still unpublished would otherwise ship a tarball
nobody can install, and npmjs only lets you unpublish for 72 hours. The check is
npmjs-only: it runs before any credentials are written, and npmjs is the registry
where the mistake is permanent.
## The verification gate
The same three commands guard every path into a registry:
@@ -143,7 +187,7 @@ a prerelease over `latest` by accident.
## Snapshots
Every commit that lands on `main` publishes both packages to the Gitea registry,
Every commit that lands on `main` publishes every package to the Gitea registry,
versioned as:
```
@@ -175,7 +219,34 @@ edit is discarded with the workspace and is never committed.
```
The tag name is `<directory>-v<version>` — the directory under `packages/`, not
the npm name. `nopy-v1.2.0`, not `@bitsquare/nopy-v1.2.0`.
the npm name. `nopy-v1.2.0`, not `@bitsquare/nopy-v1.2.0`. All four prefixes work
the same way:
```sh
git tag nopy-v1.2.0
git tag keyman-v1.2.0
git tag nopy-cube-v1.2.0
git tag cubes-core-v1.2.0
```
### Ordering when more than one package changed
Tags are independent, but the dependency graph is not. If a release touches
`nopy-cube` *and* something that depends on it, release them in this order,
waiting for each run to go green:
```
nopy-cube → nopy, cubes-core (these two are independent of each other)
```
Release `nopy` first and the run stops at the *check linked deps* step, telling
you the `nopy-cube` version it wanted is not on npmjs. That is the guard working;
release `nopy-cube`, then re-tag. `node scripts/publish-order.mjs` prints the
order if you would rather not reason about it.
Bumping `nopy-cube` means bumping the packages that depend on it in the same
change — the `workspace:*` range resolves to whatever version is in the workspace
at pack time, so their next release picks it up whether or not you meant it to.
The tag decides **which** package ships; `package.json` decides the **version**.
The workflow re-reads the manifest and refuses to continue if the two disagree:
@@ -281,12 +352,21 @@ file written into the workspace can never be committed by accident.
## Installing the packages
From npmjs — public, no configuration:
From npmjs — public, no configuration. The CLIs go on the `PATH`:
```sh
npm install -g @bitsquare/nopy @bitsquare/keyman
```
The other two go into a project. A cube bundle is a dev dependency of whatever
repo describes your infrastructure; `nopy-cube` is only needed if you are writing
cubes of your own:
```sh
pnpm add -D @bitsquare/cubes-core # then name it in .nopyrc.json cubePackages
pnpm add -D @bitsquare/nopy-cube zod # authoring your own manifests
```
From the Gitea registry, which holds every snapshot plus a mirror of every
release. Per-project, in the repo's `.npmrc`:
@@ -321,9 +401,17 @@ refuses to overwrite an existing version — without the check, a re-run would f
on the first registry and never reach the second.
**The build is explicit, publishes are `--ignore-scripts`.** `prepack` exists for
humans running `npm pack` locally; in CI the build has already run as its own
step, and repeating it inside `npm publish` would only cost time and add a way
for a lifecycle script to change what ships after the gate looked at it.
humans packing locally; in CI the build has already run as its own step, and
repeating it inside `pnpm publish` would only cost time and add a way for a
lifecycle script to change what ships after the gate looked at it.
**`verify-pack.mjs` checks the artefact, not the source.** Reading `package.json`
in the repo would only tell you what you already know — every one of them says
`workspace:*`. The question is what pnpm wrote into the tarball, so the script
packs, extracts `package/package.json`, and reads the ranges back out. It cannot
pass `--ignore-scripts`, because `pnpm pack` has no such flag (only `pnpm publish`
does), so `prepack` rebuilds — which at least means the tarball under test is
byte-for-byte the one publish would ship.
**One job per workflow.** No artifact hand-off, no second install, no risk of
publishing a tree that a different job built.
@@ -352,7 +440,31 @@ See what would actually be in the tarball:
```sh
pnpm run build
cd packages/nopy && npm pack --dry-run --ignore-scripts
cd packages/nopy && pnpm pack --dry-run
```
Check that no `workspace:` range leaks into a published manifest — the same
check CI runs:
```sh
node scripts/verify-pack.mjs
node scripts/publish-order.mjs # the order to release in
node scripts/linked-deps.mjs packages/nopy # what must be on the registry first
```
Rehearse an install the way a stranger gets one, without publishing anything.
Use **npm**, not pnpm: npm is the one that rejects a leaked `workspace:` range,
so a clean install here is the real proof.
```sh
pnpm --filter @bitsquare/nopy-cube pack --pack-destination /tmp/tgz
pnpm --filter @bitsquare/nopy pack --pack-destination /tmp/tgz
pnpm --filter @bitsquare/cubes-core pack --pack-destination /tmp/tgz
mkdir /tmp/try && cd /tmp/try && npm init -y
npm install /tmp/tgz/*.tgz
echo '{"hosts":["h"],"cubePackages":["@bitsquare/cubes-core"]}' > .nopyrc.json
./node_modules/.bin/nopy install -l session.json -P -D
```
Try the binary as an end user would get it, without publishing:
@@ -384,6 +496,9 @@ npm view @bitsquare/nopy@1.2.0 version \
| `npm pack --dry-run` step fails | A `files` or `bin` path no longer exists after the build. Fix before it reaches a registry. |
| Snapshot workflow green, nothing installable | Snapshots are only on Gitea and only under `@main`. Point the scope at the Gitea registry. |
| The release workflow did not trigger | The tag must match `*-v*` and must be pushed (`git push origin <tag>`), not just created. |
| `EUNSUPPORTEDPROTOCOL` / `Unsupported URL Type "workspace:"` on install | A `workspace:` range reached a tarball — something published with `npm publish` instead of `pnpm publish`. `verify-pack.mjs` exists to catch this before it ships. |
| `... is not published yet on npmjs` before the gate runs | Releasing a package before its `nopy-cube` dependency. Tag and release `nopy-cube` first, then re-tag. |
| `verify-pack.mjs` fails locally with a build error | `pnpm pack` runs `prepack`, so a broken build fails the check. Fix the build; there is no skip flag. |
## Recovering from a bad publish