mirror of
https://github.com/Ark0N/Codeman.git
synced 2026-09-30 12:39:42 +02:00
Codeman maintainer
c59f006bb6
Three separate "why are there boxes" reports, and I fixed them one glyph at a
time instead of as a class, so the next one was always waiting. Grouping the
tester's terminal by unicode block made the rule obvious:
RENDERS Latin-1 (·), Box Drawing (─ │), Block Elements (█ ▛ ▐),
Geometric Shapes (○ ▶), General Punctuation (…), Arrows
TOFU Miscellaneous Technical (⏎ U+23CE, ⏵ U+23F5), the sparse end
of Dingbats (❯ U+276F)
That is an ordinary font, not a broken one, so it is the profile to design
against. The working spinner moves off Dingbats and Math Operators onto
quadrant blocks (▖▘▝▗) — the same block as the `▛█▐` art claude itself draws,
which that font renders fine — and the blocked marker moves off `⚠`
(Misc Symbols, emoji presentation on many terminals) onto `▲`, the block that
already gives us `▶` and `○`.
The preview fold gains claude's own spinner dingbats (✢ ✳ ∗ ✻ ✽ ✴ → `*`) and
`⚠` → `!`. Its animated status line is exactly where a reader looks, so tofu
there is the most visible kind there is.
A test now enforces this as a CLASS: no glyph in the unicode set may come from
Misc Technical, Misc Symbols or Dingbats, with U+2714 the single documented
exception because it was observed rendering on the very font that failed the
others. Verified by scanning a live frame driven with the tester's exact
environment: zero glyphs from any of the three blocks.