mirror of
https://github.com/Ark0N/Codeman.git
synced 2026-10-03 14:09:42 +02:00
Michael GrundbergandClaude Opus 5
64c288a683
Codex states background work too, and it says so in a different place. Claude writes `· 1 monitor ·` on the last row of the screen; Codex pins `1 background terminal running · /ps to view · /stop to close` ABOVE its composer, which puts that row third from the bottom once the status line and the composer are counted. So how far up the screen to look is now per-CLI data as well: `capabilities.workDetect.watchingLines`, bounded to 1..8 by the schema, and defaulting to Claude's two. That bound is the point. The window is half the injection guard, since every row it adds is another row the agent itself may be able to write, and the label is what silences an idle alert. The other half is the anchor, and Codex's is ` · /ps to view`: chrome naming a slash command only the CLI can offer, so a session that writes "I left 1 background terminal running for you" into its own output matches nothing. Measured against a live codex-cli 0.154.0 pane rather than read out of a binary. The row appears when the terminal starts, follows the composer down as the conversation grows, and is gone after `/stop`. Verified end to end on an isolated beta: the session payload carried `watching: "1 background terminal"` and the badge rendered with it, and both cleared when the terminal stopped. The fixtures in the tests are that capture verbatim. Codex has no hook signals, so no idle prompt and no false NEEDS YOU row: for a Codex session this is the badge alone, which is the case the maintainer said a registry field could cover and a hook never could. Cross-CLI tests pin that neither pattern fires on the other's screen, and that a CLI declaring nothing still reports nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>