Files
Codeman/test
timkjrandClaude Sonnet 5 09f5f28017 docs(test): correct an overclaiming comment in the tail-fallback regression test
The comment implied the fallback could be "silently skipped" by the
stale hardcoded threshold, which isn't actually true -- the old
smaller numbers were always more eager to trigger the fallback, never
less (same correction as the commit this test belongs to). What the
test actually protects against is the fallback logic itself breaking
(e.g. a copy-paste slip dropping the check entirely), not the exact
threshold value. Reworded to say that.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 11:11:18 -05:00
..
2026-07-20 17:35:40 +02:00
2026-07-20 17:35:40 +02:00
2026-06-19 17:58:06 -04:00
2026-06-19 17:58:06 -04:00
2026-07-20 02:36:02 +02:00
2026-07-20 02:36:02 +02:00
2026-06-19 13:10:17 -04:00