A full review of the release tree found seven things, and four of them were mine.
**The gate was red, and I put it there.** Splitting `confirmed` into `confirmedContext`
and `confirmedSwap` changed the wire field without moving three assertions that check
it: `custom-model-one-shot-launch.test.ts` and two in `custom-model-run-menu-ui.test.ts`
(the swap modal and the context modal, each of which already receives exactly the right
per-question flag). Moved, with the titles.
**Worse, my own tests for the split never ran.** The four cases in
`session-custom-model.test.ts` that exist specifically to pin it call `mockRunning()`,
which was declared inside a sibling `describe`, so they threw a ReferenceError during
setup. The split would have shipped with no passing server-side coverage while the gate
reported the failure as four broken tests rather than as four tests that were never
written. `mockRunning` is hoisted to the outer describe.
**The submit verifier pressed Enter into shell panes.** `#455`'s SubmitVerifier resolved
its composer glyph as `promptGlyph ?? '❯'`, and only claude and codex declare one, so
the other eight modes fell back to claude's `❯`. That is also starship's default shell
prompt, and pure's, and spaceship's, and p10k lean's. On such a shell the line
`❯ npm run build` sits on screen for as long as the command runs, the verifier reads it
as an unsubmitted prompt, and re-presses Enter into the running program's stdin up to
nine times on its 2s..60s schedule. Mostly a stray newline; not harmless against a y/N
prompt, `read -p`, an installer or a pager, where it takes the default. The module's own
fileoverview already stated the rule this broke. Now `?? ''`, which
`promptStillInComposer()` already treats as inert, so the verifier runs only for a CLI
that actually declares a composer.
**My #451 dedent removal left a count behind**: "Two rules keep it honest" introducing
three numbered rules.
The rest is documentation the split outran. `confirmedContext`/`confirmedSwap` appeared
in no doc at all, while `docs/api-reference.md` (the SemVer-covered contract) still told
an integrator to retry with `confirmed: true` for both questions, which is precisely the
thing the split exists to stop. Documented there, in `docs/custom-model-endpoints.md`
and in CLAUDE.md. The custom-model changeset gained the split and the `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR`
multi-user consequence, both user-visible and both previously absent, and #454's gained
the one exception to its own claim: a Custom Endpoints launch ignores the Instance count
stepper and always starts one session.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
#454: the behaviour the PR adds had no test, so a regression test drives
runGrok() at tabCount 3 and asserts three quick-start POSTs with sequential
w<n>-<case> names (verified to fail against master's session-ui.js). Each
caller now reads the count BEFORE its opening banner and announces it there,
the way runClaude() already did, so a launch no longer prints two headers and
a launch with another session already active still says how many are starting.
runClaude() calls the shared _readTabCount() instead of its own copy of the
1..20 clamp, and that helper optional-chains the element read, since hoisting
it above each caller's try block would otherwise let a missing #tabCount throw
where the launch-error path cannot report it.
#435: sizeMovedUnderLoad derived from data.source alone. `mux-visible` is not
sufficient: a failed display-message cursor query makes capturePaneBuffer skip
the snapshot repaint and return the raw capture, which the route still labels
mux-visible, so a size that moved during such a load bought a full forced
reload to repair a frame that was never positioned. It now tests
Number.isFinite(data.captureRows) like its two siblings.
Plus the invariants and CLAUDE.md lines promised on #435: a visible capture
reports its geometry and omits it when nothing was positioned, the comparison
runs on mux-visible only, and the replay is capped at one attempt and latches
per session when it cannot converge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codeman maintainer