The four edits the review said would be folded in at merge, none of them
code: the changeset becomes one user-facing paragraph, since it is what
CHANGELOG.md and the release notes print; the `_bufferLoadFinishOpts` comment
now names the second contributor to the duplicate window (`captureActivePaneBuffer`
is `execSync`, so anything painted into the pane before the server read it is
in the capture and is broadcast after the reply) and says why a `history`
payload keeps the pre-existing discard when its exposure is the same; the
`_finishBufferLoad` doc block moves from above `_beginBufferLoad` onto the
function it documents; and the test file's header describes both rules the
file now pins instead of only COD-144.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A capture load now replays its queued tail, and that replay runs through
`batchTerminalWrite`, which samples `_wasAtBottomBeforeWrite` before it queues.
It runs inside `chunkedTerminalWrite`, before that promise resolves, with the
terminal freshly reset and rewritten — so the sample is always true. The caller
then restored the reader's position and the next `flushPendingWrites` scrolled
straight back to the bottom off the latched flag, undoing it. The only thing in
the way was `_hasRecentUserScrollUp()`, a 1500ms window a server-triggered
refresh is usually past.
`_syncStickyScrollBaseline()` re-takes the flag from wherever the viewport now
sits, and the two paths that restore a position call it right after doing so:
`_onSessionNeedsRefresh` and `_maybeRefetchFullHistory`. Those are the paths
#259 and #205 exist for, and they are also where a non-empty queue is most
likely, since a needsRefresh fires when output is flooding. Re-taking rather
than suppressing the sampling: suppressing leaves whatever stale value the flag
held from before the load, which on the full-history re-pull has no reason to
be false. `selectSession` and `_onSessionClearTerminal` deliberately end at the
bottom, so the sampled true is already the truth there and they do not call it.
`_bufferLoadFinishOpts` gains the coverage the CI gate can see: both mux
sources flush, `history` does not, and a payload naming no source does not.
Its only coverage was the browser suite, which CI does not run.
The JSDoc and the changeset now record the one duplicate window this cutoff
cannot close. The server appends output to the byte buffer in the same tick it
emits, but broadcasts on a batch timer — 8ms over WebSocket, 16 to 50ms over
SSE — so a batch pending when `capture-pane` ran leaves the server after the
reply and is replayed although the capture holds it. It is one batch interval
wide against a recovery window spanning the whole chunked write, and closing it
means flushing that batch server side before the capture.
The second browser test asserts its session was created, so a failed create
fails it instead of passing with zero hits.
docs/architecture-invariants.md no longer claims the replay leaves the
queued-event discard window alone. That clause now describes what decides how a
load ends, the baseline rule, the batch window, and the three covering tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Live terminal events are queued while a buffer load runs, and the load discards
that queue when it ends. That is right when the loaded buffer is the server's
accumulated byte history. The route appends to that history right up to the
moment it serializes the response, so a queued event already appears in it and
replaying it would duplicate output, most visibly Ink's cursor-up redraws.
A tmux pane capture is a photograph, current only as of the instant
`capture-pane` ran. Output printed afterwards was queued and then dropped, and
nothing scheduled a re-fetch to recover it: `_onSessionNeedsRefresh` is wired
only to the 128KB overflow path. The CLI's next partial redraw then landed on a
frame the terminal never received.
How much went missing depended on which capture the route served. A `?full=1`
load returns the capture alone, with no history in front of it, so it lost
everything from the capture to the end of the chunked write. A `?tail=` load
returns history, a clear, and then the capture, and the route reads that history
after the capture, so it lost everything from the response to the end of that
write. The chunked write dominates either way. An agent CLI hides the loss on
its next full redraw; a shell session does not, because its output is linear and
nothing repaints it.
Queue entries now carry their arrival time, and `_finishBufferLoad` takes a
`since` cutoff, so a capture load replays exactly the tail that arrived after
the response headers. The earlier events stay dropped, because a payload that
carries history does hold those.
All four paths that fetch a terminal buffer and write it now decide this the
same way, through one `_bufferLoadFinishOpts` helper, so they cannot drift
apart: `selectSession`, `_onSessionNeedsRefresh`, `_onSessionClearTerminal` and
`_maybeRefetchFullHistory`. The second of those is the one that stings. It
exists to restore output the client already dropped once under backpressure, and
it was dropping more output while performing that recovery. The cache-hit write
inside `selectSession` stays on discard deliberately: it runs before the fetch,
so its queue holds only events the capture that follows already contains.
Two further things had to change for that tail to still exist when the load
ends, and a browser test is what found both. `chunkedTerminalWrite` is what ends
the load for every non-empty buffer, so the flush policy travels to its own
finish calls; the call in `selectSession` runs only when the write was skipped.
`_beginBufferLoad` no longer empties the queue when one load re-enters it, which
it does on every write, because that reset discarded the whole fetch window
before anything could replay it.
The response already distinguishes the sources. `source` reads `mux-visible` or
`mux-full-history` for a capture and `history` for the byte stream.
Follows #395, #396 and #397, which fixed the ways the replayed frame itself
could disagree with the terminal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>