The cherry-picked "copy an existing case" commit declared a second
`CaseInfo.docker.owned` and emitted `owned: true|false` on every docker
case, while master had meanwhile shipped the same field from the
adopted-container work with a narrower wire shape: `owned` is present
only when false, absent means owned. Two declarations failed typecheck,
and two emit styles on one response would have made the picker's answer
depend on which read path filled it.
Keep master's shape at both response sites (the case list and the
single-case lookup, which lacked the field entirely), fold the picker's
reason for the field into the existing doc comment, and repoint the test
that pinned "set on exactly two sites" at the surviving form, adding a
negative pin so the duplicate style cannot come back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The previous version cleared the case name and the in-container directory on the
grounds that they must differ. That left a form with three fields mysteriously
filled and two empty, and turned the most common operation — changing
/srv/app/api to /srv/app/web — into retyping a long path.
Both are now pre-filled, with focus on the in-container directory and the caret
at the end, since the tail is what changes. What stops an unmodified submit is no
longer an empty field but a guard: the values applied are recorded, compared at
submit time, and if nothing changed the reason is stated next to the field and
focus moves to it, without sending a request that is certain to be refused.
The server refuses these anyway (a duplicate case name, a twin case on the same
container and directory) and its errors are clear; but making a round trip to be
told "you forgot to edit the field you are looking at" is worse than saying so on
the spot. The guard only applies when a source case was actually selected, so
filling the adopt form from scratch is unaffected.
⚠️ The status text is written into dockerLinkStatus. My first version referenced
an id that does not exist (dockerAdoptStatus), which made the explanation vanish
silently and left only a toast. The test now extracts that id from the code and
looks it up in index.html, pinning that it must really exist.
(cherry picked from commit ba21ae11f4)
The backend already lets one adopted container back several cases pointing at
different in-container directories, but using it meant retyping the container
name, host and workspace one by one — exactly the friction that leaves a
capability unused. Picking an existing case from a dropdown now carries those
three over, leaving only the two fields that must differ: the case name and the
in-container directory.
Clearing those two is the point of the feature, not a convenience: keeping the
old name is refused by the server as "case already exists", and keeping the old
directory is refused as "a twin case on the same container and directory". Both
errors are clear, but a form pre-filled with values that are guaranteed to be
rejected is a trap. Focus lands on the in-container directory — the thing the
user came here to change.
⚠️ Only adopted containers are listed (docker.owned === false). A Codeman-built
container's lifecycle belongs to its one case — a second case would be torn out
by that case's recreate or delete — so the server refuses it anyway, and listing
it here would only manufacture a baffling error. `owned` may be absent and absent
means owned, so the test is `!== false`, not truthiness.
CaseInfo.docker gains containerWorkdir and owned for this: the former is the
"which directory does this case use" half of the picker, without which the user
cannot tell what to change it to; the latter backs the filter above. ⚠️ Both
places that build a docker CaseInfo (the list endpoint and the single-case query)
must set them — filling in only one makes the picker work or not depending on
which read path was taken, and a test pins "exactly two".
(cherry picked from commit f1ed3a58e1)
Codeman maintainer